How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
TEN — the basics
421 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 98-117 | 46% | -1.0 | 0/215 | n=215 |
| vs HOU | 19-28 | 40% | -4.5 | 0/47 | n=47 |
| in a division game | 68-94 | 42% | -2.7 | 0/162 | n=162 |
| in the Sunday early window | 128-168 | 43% | -1.5 | 0/296 | n=296 |
| in January | 11-17 | 39% | -0.9 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| on turf | 36-51 | 41% | -3.1 | 0/87 | n=87 |
| at this venue | 9-14 | 39% | -4.9 | 0/23 | n=23 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 35-47 | 43% | -1.8 | 0/82 | n=82 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
TEN — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -4.1 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 421 graded games: -1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=421 |
| TEN has failed to cover 2 straight | n=2 |
TEN — combinations
0 lean TEN · 94 lean against
Read this first. 102 combinations shown. The best one here is 46%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 71% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + in the Sunday early window | 60-77 | 44%from 46% | -1.4 | 0/137 | n=137 |
| + on turf | 22-39 | 36%from 44% | -4.3 | 0/61 | n=61 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-9 | 31%from 36% | -6.8 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| + at this venue | 1-6 | 14%from 36% | -12.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 6-12 | 33%from 44% | -6.6 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-18 | 28%from 44% | -7.4 | 0/25 | n=25 |
| in January + in the last 5 seasons | 3-4 | 43%from 39% | -0.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 17-24 | 41%from 46% | -3.0 | 0/41 | n=41 |
| on the road + in a division game | 33-47 | 41%from 46% | -3.1 | 0/80 | n=80 |
| + in the Sunday early window | 25-37 | 40%from 41% | -3.1 | 0/62 | n=62 |
| + at this venue | 6-12 | 33%from 40% | -6.6 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-8 | 33%from 40% | -4.7 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + on turf | 8-21 | 28%from 40% | -6.6 | 0/29 | n=29 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-9 | 40%from 41% | -3.8 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + at this venue | 9-14 | 39%from 41% | -4.9 | 0/23 | n=23 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 39% | -5.0 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 11-23 | 32%from 41% | -5.9 | 0/34 | n=34 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-6 | 40%from 32% | -3.0 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 2-7 | 22%from 32% | -10.8 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + in January | 2-5 | 29%from 41% | -7.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| on the road + on turf | 35-50 | 41%from 46% | -3.2 | 0/85 | n=85 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-12 | 37%from 41% | -4.7 | 0/19 | n=19 |
| + at this venue | 2-7 | 22%from 41% | -10.8 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 22% | -5.0 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + in January | 7-10 | 41%from 46% | -1.2 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + on turf | 2-5 | 29%from 41% | -2.1 | 0/7 | n=7 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.