How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
MIA — the basics
419 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 106-104 | 50% | -0.3 | 0/210 | n=210 |
| vs NE | 26-25 | 51% | -0.2 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| in a division game | 78-79 | 50% | -0.7 | 0/157 | n=157 |
| in the Sunday early window | 134-137 | 49% | -0.2 | 0/271 | n=271 |
| in January | 9-13 | 41% | -5.9 | 0/22 | n=22 |
| outdoors | 188-191 | 50% | -0.3 | 0/379 | n=379 |
| on turf | 61-54 | 53% | -0.6 | 0/115 | n=115 |
| at this venue | 10-14 | 42% | -2.7 | 0/24 | n=24 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 44-42 | 51% | -0.8 | 0/86 | n=86 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
MIA — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.0 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 419 graded games: -0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=419 |
MIA — combinations
82 lean MIA · 91 lean against
Read this first. 192 combinations shown. The best one here is 83%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs NE + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 51% | +3.5 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| at this venue + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 42% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in a division game + in the last 5 seasons | 20-10 | 67%from 50% | +0.9 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| on turf + in the last 5 seasons | 16-10 | 62%from 53% | -0.4 | 0/26 | n=26 |
| in a division game + in January | 8-6 | 57%from 50% | -2.0 | 0/14 | n=14 |
| + outdoors | 8-6 | 57%from 57% | -2.0 | 0/14 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | -0.1 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 2-4 | 33%from 57% | -12.2 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | -0.1 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 2-4 | 33%from 57% | -12.2 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| vs NE + in January | 4-3 | 57%from 51% | -1.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + outdoors | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | -1.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| on the road + on turf | 61-54 | 53%from 50% | -0.6 | 0/115 | n=115 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 16-10 | 62%from 53% | -0.4 | 0/26 | n=26 |
| + at this venue | 8-9 | 47%from 53% | -4.2 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 47% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| outdoors + on turf | 44-39 | 53%from 50% | -1.4 | 0/83 | n=83 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-6 | 65%from 53% | -1.8 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + at this venue | 8-9 | 47%from 53% | -4.2 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 47% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in the Sunday early window + in the last 5 seasons | 29-26 | 53%from 49% | +0.1 | 0/55 | n=55 |
| in a division game + on turf | 35-32 | 52%from 50% | -1.7 | 0/67 | n=67 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-4 | 73%from 52% | -0.3 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + at this venue | 8-9 | 47%from 52% | -4.2 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 47% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.