How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
CLE — the basics
415 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 94-117 | 45% | -2.0 | 0/211 | n=211 |
| vs CIN | 23-28 | 45% | -0.0 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| in a division game | 73-89 | 45% | -2.0 | 0/162 | n=162 |
| in the Sunday early window | 133-171 | 44% | -2.0 | 0/304 | n=304 |
| in January | 10-10 | 50% | -2.1 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| outdoors | 171-211 | 45% | -2.0 | 0/382 | n=382 |
| on turf | 41-54 | 43% | -1.7 | 0/95 | n=95 |
| at this venue | 11-14 | 44% | +2.0 | 0/25 | n=25 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 36-48 | 43% | -2.2 | 0/84 | n=84 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
CLE — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.8 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 415 graded games: -1.8 pts vs their number per game | n=415 |
| CLE has covered 3 straight | n=3 |
CLE — combinations
4 lean CLE · 161 lean against
Read this first. 186 combinations shown. The best one here is 62%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 70% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + in January | 7-6 | 54%from 45% | -1.4 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| + outdoors | 6-5 | 55%from 54% | -0.3 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-4 | 33%from 55% | -2.2 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-5 | 29%from 54% | -6.6 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| in January + outdoors | 9-9 | 50%from 50% | -1.5 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-5 | 29%from 50% | -2.1 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| in the Sunday early window + in January | 7-7 | 50%from 44% | -0.8 | 0/14 | n=14 |
| + outdoors | 6-7 | 46%from 50% | -2.3 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 46% | +0.8 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 50% | +0.8 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| vs CIN + in the last 5 seasons | 5-5 | 50%from 45% | +5.8 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| in a division game + in the last 5 seasons | 14-16 | 47%from 45% | +0.6 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| in a division game + on turf | 19-23 | 45%from 45% | -0.4 | 0/42 | n=42 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-4 | 43%from 45% | +4.1 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 8-11 | 42%from 45% | +1.5 | 0/19 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 42% | +2.6 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| vs CIN + in a division game | 23-28 | 45%from 45% | -0.0 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-5 | 50%from 45% | +5.8 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + outdoors | 23-28 | 45%from 45% | -0.0 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-5 | 50%from 45% | +5.8 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + on turf | 9-11 | 45%from 45% | +2.5 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| + at this venue | 11-14 | 44%from 45% | +2.0 | 0/25 | n=25 |
| + on turf | 9-11 | 45%from 45% | +2.5 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 45% | +5.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 8-11 | 42%from 45% | +1.5 | 0/19 | n=19 |
| + in the Sunday early window | 21-26 | 45%from 45% | -0.9 | 0/47 | n=47 |
| + outdoors | 21-26 | 45%from 45% | -0.9 | 0/47 | n=47 |
| + on turf | 8-10 | 44%from 45% | +1.7 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-5 | 44%from 45% | +4.1 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + at this venue | 10-13 | 43%from 45% | +1.3 | 0/23 | n=23 |
| + at this venue | 11-14 | 44%from 45% | +2.0 | 0/25 | n=25 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 44% | +2.6 | 0/5 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.