NYG at DAL—
ST Model DAL -3.4
Since first recorded DAL -4.5o/u 49.5unchanged · 6d ago · 1 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 17
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
NYG — the basics
428 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 126-93 | 58% | +1.0 | 0/219 | n=219 |
| vs DAL | 27-25 | 52% | -1.0 | 0/52 | n=52 |
| in a division game | 83-78 | 52% | +0.1 | 0/161 | n=161 |
| in the Sunday early window | 110-106 | 51% | -0.3 | 0/216 | n=216 |
| in January | 19-12 | 61% | +2.5 | 0/31 | n=31 |
| on turf | 136-141 | 49% | -1.0 | 0/277 | n=277 |
| at this venue | 9-8 | 53% | -1.4 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 42-44 | 49% | -0.9 | 0/86 | n=86 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
NYG — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: +2.0 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 428 graded games: -0.4 pts vs their number per game | n=428 |
| NYG has covered 2 straight | n=2 |
NYG — combinations
48 lean NYG · 38 lean against
Read this first. 97 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 4.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs DAL + in January | 5-0 | 100%from 52% | +10.7 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +10.7 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in January + on turf | 9-5 | 64%from 61% | +2.7 | 0/14 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 64% | +12.9 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + in January | 10-6 | 63%from 58% | +0.9 | 0/16 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 63% | -5.2 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in a division game + in January | 10-6 | 63%from 52% | +3.2 | 0/16 | n=16 |
| + on turf | 6-3 | 67%from 63% | +4.6 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 63% | +2.7 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| on the road + in the Sunday early window | 53-32 | 62%from 58% | +2.1 | 0/85 | n=85 |
| + on turf | 23-13 | 64%from 62% | +2.2 | 0/36 | n=36 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 64% | -1.8 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-12 | 40%from 62% | -1.9 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| on the road + on turf | 54-39 | 58%from 58% | +1.1 | 0/93 | n=93 |
| + at this venue | 9-8 | 53%from 58% | -1.4 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 53% | -5.9 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 58% | -1.9 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| vs DAL + in the Sunday early window | 8-6 | 57%from 52% | +0.4 | 0/14 | n=14 |
| + on turf | 7-5 | 58%from 57% | +1.0 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| on the road + in a division game | 46-36 | 56%from 58% | +1.1 | 0/82 | n=82 |
| + in the Sunday early window | 18-10 | 64%from 56% | +2.8 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| + on turf | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +4.0 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-5 | 29%from 64% | -2.5 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + in January | 4-3 | 57%from 56% | +2.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 16-14 | 53%from 56% | +0.4 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| + at this venue | 9-8 | 53%from 53% | -1.4 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 53% | -5.9 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 9-8 | 53%from 56% | -1.4 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 53% | -5.9 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-9 | 44%from 56% | -2.5 | 0/16 | n=16 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.