How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
NO — the basics
435 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 122-94 | 56% | +1.7 | 9/216 | n=216 |
| vs ATL | 30-22 | 58% | +1.1 | 2/52 | n=52 |
| in a division game | 88-74 | 54% | +1.4 | 6/162 | n=162 |
| in the Sunday early window | 134-124 | 52% | +0.6 | 12/258 | n=258 |
| in January | 17-16 | 52% | +0.1 | 1/33 | n=33 |
| on turf | 147-154 | 49% | +0.3 | 12/301 | n=301 |
| at this venue | 6-3 | 67% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| under this head coach | 9-8 | 53% | -0.2 | 17/17 | n=17 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 38-46 | 45% | +0.7 | 17/84 | n=84 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
NO — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 435 graded games: +0.7 pts vs their number per game | n=435 |
| NO has covered 6 straight | n=6 |
NO — combinations
98 lean NO · 9 lean against
Read this first. 128 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 4.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs ATL + in January | 5-0 | 100%from 58% | +9.2 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +9.2 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| in January + in the last 5 seasons | 6-1 | 86%from 52% | +7.4 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| in the Sunday early window + under this head coach | 8-4 | 67%from 52% | +4.6 | 12/12 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-4 | 67%from 67% | +4.6 | 12/12 | n=12 |
| on the road + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 56% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 67% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + under this head coach | 6-3 | 67%from 56% | 0.0 | 9/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-3 | 67%from 67% | 0.0 | 9/9 | n=9 |
| vs ATL + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 58% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 67% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| in a division game + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 54% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 67% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| on turf + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 49% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 67% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| in a division game + under this head coach | 4-2 | 67%from 54% | +0.7 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +0.7 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| in the Sunday early window + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 52% | -0.5 | 1/6 | n=6 |
| on the road + in a division game | 52-27 | 66%from 56% | +4.7 | 3/79 | n=79 |
| + in January | 7-2 | 78%from 66% | +5.7 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the Sunday early window | 36-18 | 67%from 66% | +4.8 | 3/54 | n=54 |
| + on turf | 12-6 | 67%from 67% | +4.2 | 1/18 | n=18 |
| + in January | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +4.0 | 1/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | -0.5 | 1/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-5 | 55%from 67% | -0.6 | 3/11 | n=11 |
| + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 66% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 67% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 18-10 | 64%from 66% | +3.3 | 1/28 | n=28 |
| + at this venue | 6-3 | 67%from 64% | +0.3 | 1/9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 64% | -1.5 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-5 | 64%from 66% | +1.5 | 3/14 | n=14 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.