How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
BAL — the basics
439 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 122-102 | 54% | +1.7 | 0/224 | n=224 |
| vs CIN | 24-27 | 47% | +0.2 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| in a division game | 82-81 | 50% | +1.2 | 0/163 | n=163 |
| on a short week | 9-8 | 53% | +3.6 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| on Thursday night | 8-10 | 44% | +1.1 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| in December | 62-48 | 56% | +2.9 | 0/110 | n=110 |
| outdoors | 213-196 | 52% | +2.3 | 0/409 | n=409 |
| on turf | 97-89 | 52% | +2.6 | 0/186 | n=186 |
| at this venue | 13-13 | 50% | +1.6 | 0/26 | n=26 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 44-44 | 50% | +1.3 | 0/88 | n=88 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
BAL — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -2.5 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 439 graded games: +2.2 pts vs their number per game | n=439 |
BAL — combinations
53 lean BAL · 94 lean against
Read this first. 187 combinations shown. The best one here is 80%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 83% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at this venue + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +3.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on turf + in the last 5 seasons | 15-5 | 75%from 52% | +3.9 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| on the road + in December | 32-17 | 65%from 54% | +3.5 | 0/49 | n=49 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-3 | 73%from 65% | +7.4 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| + outdoors | 29-15 | 66%from 65% | +3.6 | 0/44 | n=44 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-3 | 70%from 66% | +5.8 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + on turf | 6-6 | 50%from 66% | +3.3 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 66% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 8-7 | 53%from 65% | +4.5 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 65% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in December + in the last 5 seasons | 12-8 | 60%from 56% | +5.0 | 0/20 | n=20 |
| on a short week + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 53% | +0.6 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| in December + outdoors | 59-46 | 56%from 56% | +2.9 | 0/105 | n=105 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-8 | 58%from 56% | +4.0 | 0/19 | n=19 |
| + on turf | 20-23 | 47%from 56% | +1.9 | 0/43 | n=43 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 56% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + in a division game | 46-36 | 56%from 54% | +1.5 | 0/82 | n=82 |
| + in December | 15-6 | 71%from 56% | +4.4 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + outdoors | 15-6 | 71%from 71% | +4.4 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 71% | +0.2 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 71% | -0.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 2-4 | 33%from 71% | +3.0 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + outdoors | 46-36 | 56%from 56% | +1.5 | 0/82 | n=82 |
| + at this venue | 13-13 | 50%from 56% | +1.6 | 0/26 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-8 | 47%from 56% | -0.3 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + on turf | 13-15 | 46%from 56% | +0.3 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| + at this venue | 13-13 | 50%from 56% | +1.6 | 0/26 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +3.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-8 | 47%from 56% | -0.3 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + on turf | 13-15 | 46%from 56% | +0.3 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 46% | +3.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 9-11 | 45%from 46% | +0.3 | 0/20 | n=20 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.