BUF at DEN—
ST Model BUF -1.3
Since first recorded BUF -1.5o/u 46.5unchanged · 6d ago · 3 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 16
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
BUF — the basics
423 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 108-101 | 52% | +0.1 | 77/209 | n=209 |
| vs DEN | 9-3 | 75% | +8.5 | 6/12 | n=12 |
| on Friday/Saturday | 7-8 | 47% | +6.4 | 9/15 | n=15 |
| in December | 57-55 | 51% | +0.6 | 38/112 | n=112 |
| outdoors | 196-182 | 52% | +0.6 | 138/378 | n=378 |
| on grass | 62-60 | 51% | -0.9 | 41/122 | n=122 |
| at this venue | 4-1 | 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| under this head coach | 85-73 | 54% | +2.3 | 158/158 | n=158 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 47-45 | 51% | +2.8 | 92/92 | n=92 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
BUF — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.0 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 423 graded games: +0.5 pts vs their number per game | n=423 |
BUF — combinations
64 lean BUF · 8 lean against
Read this first. 94 combinations shown. The best one here is 80%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs DEN | 4-1 | 80%from 52% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 52% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| vs DEN + in December | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +13.0 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +13.0 | 1/5 | n=5 |
| vs DEN + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| vs DEN + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| outdoors + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 52% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| on grass + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 51% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| vs DEN + outdoors | 9-3 | 75%from 75% | +8.5 | 6/12 | n=12 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +8.0 | 2/5 | n=5 |
| + under this head coach | 4-2 | 67%from 75% | +9.3 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| vs DEN + under this head coach | 4-2 | 67%from 75% | +9.3 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| on the road + in December | 31-23 | 57%from 52% | +1.1 | 18/54 | n=54 |
| + under this head coach | 12-6 | 67%from 57% | +4.8 | 18/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 67% | +2.6 | 10/10 | n=10 |
| + outdoors | 28-18 | 61%from 57% | +2.5 | 14/46 | n=46 |
| + under this head coach | 10-4 | 71%from 61% | +5.9 | 14/14 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 61% | +4.9 | 7/7 | n=7 |
| + on grass | 18-15 | 55%from 61% | +0.2 | 9/33 | n=33 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 57% | +2.6 | 10/10 | n=10 |
| + on grass | 19-15 | 56%from 57% | +0.6 | 10/34 | n=34 |
| + under this head coach | 7-3 | 70%from 56% | +7.7 | 10/10 | n=10 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.