How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
TEN — the basics
421 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 98-117 | 46% | -1.0 | 0/215 | n=215 |
| vs DET | 5-2 | 71% | +4.4 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| in the Sunday early window | 128-168 | 43% | -1.5 | 0/296 | n=296 |
| in December | 46-63 | 42% | -1.6 | 0/109 | n=109 |
| indoors | 26-31 | 46% | -1.3 | 0/57 | n=57 |
| on turf | 36-51 | 41% | -3.1 | 0/87 | n=87 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 35-47 | 43% | -1.8 | 0/82 | n=82 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
TEN — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -4.1 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 421 graded games: -1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=421 |
| TEN has failed to cover 2 straight | n=2 |
TEN — combinations
1 lean TEN · 43 lean against
Read this first. 51 combinations shown. The best one here is 71%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs DET + in the Sunday early window | 4-2 | 67%from 71% | +0.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| on the road + indoors | 26-31 | 46%from 46% | -1.3 | 0/57 | n=57 |
| + on turf | 20-26 | 43%from 46% | -1.7 | 0/46 | n=46 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-7 | 36%from 43% | -4.0 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-8 | 38%from 46% | -3.2 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| on the road + in the Sunday early window | 60-77 | 44%from 46% | -1.4 | 0/137 | n=137 |
| + in December | 14-21 | 40%from 44% | -3.7 | 0/35 | n=35 |
| + on turf | 4-13 | 24%from 40% | -6.3 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + indoors | 2-10 | 17%from 40% | -9.3 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 1-6 | 14%from 40% | -9.4 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + indoors | 15-24 | 38%from 44% | -3.9 | 0/39 | n=39 |
| + on turf | 11-22 | 33%from 38% | -4.5 | 0/33 | n=33 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-5 | 29%from 38% | -8.4 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 22-39 | 36%from 44% | -4.3 | 0/61 | n=61 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-9 | 31%from 36% | -6.8 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-18 | 28%from 44% | -7.4 | 0/25 | n=25 |
| indoors + on turf | 20-26 | 43%from 46% | -1.7 | 0/46 | n=46 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-7 | 36%from 43% | -4.0 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 17-24 | 41%from 46% | -3.0 | 0/41 | n=41 |
| in the Sunday early window + in December | 31-44 | 41%from 43% | -2.0 | 0/75 | n=75 |
| + on turf | 4-13 | 24%from 41% | -6.3 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-12 | 20%from 41% | -5.0 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| + indoors | 2-10 | 17%from 41% | -9.3 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + on turf | 1-10 | 9%from 17% | -10.7 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| on the road + on turf | 35-50 | 41%from 46% | -3.2 | 0/85 | n=85 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-12 | 37%from 41% | -4.7 | 0/19 | n=19 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.