How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
PIT — the basics
440 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 115-102 | 53% | +0.5 | 0/217 | n=217 |
| vs CIN | 36-17 | 68% | +3.7 | 0/53 | n=53 |
| in a division game | 99-68 | 59% | +2.1 | 0/167 | n=167 |
| off a bye | 31-26 | 54% | +2.4 | 0/57 | n=57 |
| on Sunday night | 28-31 | 47% | -0.9 | 0/59 | n=59 |
| in November | 49-50 | 49% | +0.4 | 0/99 | n=99 |
| outdoors | 218-188 | 54% | +1.0 | 0/406 | n=406 |
| on turf | 88-72 | 55% | +0.7 | 0/160 | n=160 |
| at this venue | 20-7 | 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 48-39 | 55% | -0.3 | 0/87 | n=87 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
PIT — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.4 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 440 graded games: +1.1 pts vs their number per game | n=440 |
PIT — combinations
161 lean PIT · 15 lean against
Read this first. 196 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 88% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 4.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs CIN + off a bye | 5-0 | 100%from 68% | +7.0 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +7.0 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in November + at this venue | 6-1 | 86%from 49% | -0.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| off a bye + in the last 5 seasons | 9-2 | 82%from 54% | +3.9 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| on turf + at this venue | 16-5 | 76%from 55% | +4.9 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 76% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs CIN | 20-7 | 74%from 53% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + in November | 6-1 | 86%from 74% | -0.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + outdoors | 6-1 | 86%from 86% | -0.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 6-1 | 86%from 86% | -0.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 4-1 | 80%from 86% | -3.6 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on turf | 16-5 | 76%from 74% | +4.9 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + at this venue | 16-5 | 76%from 76% | +4.9 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 76% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in a division game | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + in November | 6-1 | 86%from 74% | -0.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 16-5 | 76%from 74% | +4.9 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + outdoors | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + at this venue | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 74% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + on turf | 16-5 | 76%from 74% | +4.9 | 0/21 | n=21 |
| + at this venue | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 74% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 20-7 | 74%from 74% | +3.9 | 0/27 | n=27 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 74% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 74% | -2.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.