HOU at CLE—
ST Model HOU -8
Since first recorded HOU -4.5o/u 38.5unchanged · 6d ago · 1 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 10
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
HOU — the basics
393 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 95-103 | 48% | -0.3 | 29/198 | n=198 |
| vs CLE | 10-5 | 67% | +3.5 | 2/15 | n=15 |
| in the Sunday early window | 143-139 | 51% | +0.2 | 37/282 | n=282 |
| in November | 49-42 | 54% | +0.7 | 12/91 | n=91 |
| outdoors | 101-99 | 51% | +1.0 | 24/200 | n=200 |
| on grass | 116-117 | 50% | +0.6 | 14/233 | n=233 |
| at this venue | 4-2 | 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| under this head coach | 29-27 | 52% | +2.5 | 56/56 | n=56 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 45-44 | 51% | +1.6 | 56/89 | n=89 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
HOU — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: +6.2 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 393 graded games: -0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=393 |
HOU — combinations
97 lean HOU · 10 lean against
Read this first. 127 combinations shown. The best one here is 86%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 75% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs CLE + in November | 4-1 | 80%from 67% | +7.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +7.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| in the Sunday early window + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 51% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| vs CLE + outdoors | 6-2 | 75%from 67% | +3.3 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| + on grass | 6-2 | 75%from 75% | +3.3 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 75% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 75% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| vs CLE + on grass | 7-3 | 70%from 67% | +1.6 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 70% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| vs CLE + in the Sunday early window | 9-4 | 69%from 67% | +2.1 | 1/13 | n=13 |
| + outdoors | 6-1 | 86%from 69% | +4.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on grass | 6-1 | 86%from 86% | +4.9 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 86% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + in November | 4-1 | 80%from 69% | +7.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +7.1 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 69% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 7-2 | 78%from 69% | +2.7 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 78% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs CLE | 4-2 | 67%from 48% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + in the Sunday early window | 4-1 | 80%from 67% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.3 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + outdoors | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + on grass | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + on grass | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +3.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.