TEN at CIN—
ST Model CIN -8.4
Since first recorded CIN -6.5o/u 49.5unchanged · 34d ago · 2 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 8
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
TEN — the basics
421 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 98-117 | 46% | -1.0 | 0/215 | n=215 |
| vs CIN | 6-11 | 35% | -1.1 | 0/17 | n=17 |
| in the Sunday early window | 128-168 | 43% | -1.5 | 0/296 | n=296 |
| in November | 45-54 | 45% | +0.0 | 0/99 | n=99 |
| outdoors | 164-200 | 45% | -0.9 | 0/364 | n=364 |
| on turf | 36-51 | 41% | -3.1 | 0/87 | n=87 |
| at this venue | 3-4 | 43% | -4.7 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 35-47 | 43% | -1.8 | 0/82 | n=82 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
TEN — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -4.1 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 421 graded games: -1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=421 |
| TEN has failed to cover 2 straight | n=2 |
TEN — combinations
2 lean TEN · 63 lean against
Read this first. 75 combinations shown. The best one here is 56%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in November + on turf | 10-8 | 56%from 45% | +1.4 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| in November + in the last 5 seasons | 9-10 | 47%from 45% | -0.6 | 0/19 | n=19 |
| on the road + outdoors | 72-86 | 46%from 46% | -0.9 | 0/158 | n=158 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-16 | 43%from 46% | -2.8 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| + at this venue | 3-4 | 43%from 46% | -4.7 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 15-24 | 38%from 46% | -4.9 | 0/39 | n=39 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-5 | 38%from 38% | -5.6 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| on the road + in November | 23-28 | 45%from 46% | +0.6 | 0/51 | n=51 |
| + on turf | 10-8 | 56%from 45% | +1.4 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-5 | 44%from 45% | +1.4 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + outdoors | 14-22 | 39%from 45% | -0.7 | 0/36 | n=36 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-4 | 33%from 39% | -2.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| in the Sunday early window + outdoors | 113-144 | 44%from 43% | -1.1 | 0/257 | n=257 |
| + at this venue | 3-4 | 43%from 44% | -4.7 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 12-18 | 40%from 44% | -3.7 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-5 | 38%from 40% | -3.4 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 21-33 | 39%from 44% | -2.7 | 0/54 | n=54 |
| on the road + in the Sunday early window | 60-77 | 44%from 46% | -1.4 | 0/137 | n=137 |
| + outdoors | 45-53 | 46%from 44% | -0.4 | 0/98 | n=98 |
| + at this venue | 3-4 | 43%from 46% | -4.7 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 11-17 | 39%from 46% | -4.0 | 0/28 | n=28 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-13 | 28%from 46% | -7.1 | 0/18 | n=18 |
| + at this venue | 3-4 | 43%from 44% | -4.7 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| + in November | 13-20 | 39%from 44% | -0.8 | 0/33 | n=33 |
| + on turf | 6-6 | 50%from 39% | -2.0 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + outdoors | 8-16 | 33%from 39% | -1.4 | 0/24 | n=24 |
| + on turf | 22-39 | 36%from 44% | -4.3 | 0/61 | n=61 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-9 | 31%from 36% | -6.8 | 0/13 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-18 | 28%from 44% | -7.4 | 0/25 | n=25 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.