CIN at HOUHOU -2.5o/u 46.5
ST Model HOU -5.9(+3.4 vs market)
Since first recorded HOU -2.5o/u 46.5unchanged · 50d ago · 2 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 2
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
CIN — the basics
419 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 119-93 | 56% | +0.4 | 62/212 | n=212 |
| vs HOU | 5-9 | 36% | -1.9 | 2/14 | n=14 |
| as an underdog | 122-110 | 53% | 0.0 | 64/232 | n=232 |
| spread 1-2.5 | 41-48 | 46% | -0.2 | 26/89 | n=89 |
| in the Sunday early window | 148-147 | 50% | -0.4 | 74/295 | n=295 |
| in September | 46-40 | 53% | -1.5 | 25/86 | n=86 |
| on turf | 118-117 | 50% | -0.8 | 58/235 | n=235 |
| at this venue | 4-3 | 57% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| under this head coach | 67-53 | 56% | +0.1 | 120/120 | n=120 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 52-36 | 59% | +0.7 | 88/88 | n=88 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
CIN — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -2.2 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 419 graded games: -0.3 pts vs their number per game | n=419 |
CIN — combinations
87 lean CIN · 55 lean against
Read this first. 158 combinations shown. The best one here is 83%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 86% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 30-16 | 65%from 56% | +1.5 | 46/46 | n=46 |
| on the road + under this head coach | 38-24 | 61%from 56% | +0.7 | 62/62 | n=62 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 30-16 | 65%from 61% | +1.5 | 46/46 | n=46 |
| on the road + in September | 29-19 | 60%from 56% | -0.1 | 15/48 | n=48 |
| + on turf | 11-8 | 58%from 60% | -3.2 | 6/19 | n=19 |
| + under this head coach | 3-3 | 50%from 58% | -8.2 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| + under this head coach | 8-7 | 53%from 60% | -3.9 | 15/15 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-6 | 40%from 53% | -5.5 | 10/10 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-6 | 40%from 60% | -5.5 | 10/10 | n=10 |
| under this head coach + in the last 5 seasons | 52-36 | 59%from 56% | +0.7 | 88/88 | n=88 |
| as an underdog + in September | 26-18 | 59%from 53% | -0.6 | 12/44 | n=44 |
| + on turf | 13-6 | 68%from 59% | -1.2 | 4/19 | n=19 |
| + under this head coach | 7-5 | 58%from 59% | -2.5 | 12/12 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 58% | -4.3 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 59% | -4.3 | 6/6 | n=6 |
| as an underdog + in the last 5 seasons | 21-15 | 58%from 53% | +2.2 | 36/36 | n=36 |
| on the road + vs HOU | 4-3 | 57%from 56% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| + as an underdog | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| on the road + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 56% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| vs HOU + as an underdog | 4-3 | 57%from 36% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| vs HOU + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 36% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
| as an underdog + at this venue | 4-3 | 57%from 53% | +3.6 | 1/7 | n=7 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.