TB at CINCIN -3.5o/u 52.5

ST Model CIN -1.6(-1.9 vs market)
Since first recorded CIN -3.5flato/u 51.5+149d ago · 9 books · 1 moved off it
Trends · player props · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
TB — the basics
425 graded games since 1999
on the road106-10750%+0.635/213n=213
vs CIN5-271%+4.61/7n=7
as an underdog108-10551%+0.531/213n=213
spread 3.5-6.565-8543%+0.130/150n=150
in the Sunday early window134-12552%+0.838/259n=259
in September45-4252%+0.614/87n=87
outdoors151-18445%-0.552/335n=335
on turf60-5751%+1.425/117n=117
under this head coach31-4044%+0.071/71n=71
in the last 5 seasons41-4946%+0.171/90n=90
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
TB — form & streaks
Last 16 games: -3.2 pts vs their number per gamen=16
All 425 graded games: +0.0 pts vs their number per gamen=425
TB has failed to cover 9 straightn=9
TB — combinations
123 lean TB · 83 lean against
Read this first. 237 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 83% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 7.
CombinationRec%PtsNowSample
vs CIN + as an underdog4-180%from 71%+2.61/5n=5
+ spread 3.5-6.54-180%from 80%+2.61/5n=5
+ outdoors4-180%from 80%+2.61/5n=5
+ outdoors4-180%from 80%+2.61/5n=5
vs CIN + in the Sunday early window4-180%from 71%+3.70/5n=5
+ outdoors4-180%from 80%+3.70/5n=5
vs CIN + spread 3.5-6.55-271%from 71%+4.61/7n=7
+ in the Sunday early window4-180%from 71%+3.70/5n=5
+ outdoors4-180%from 80%+3.70/5n=5
+ outdoors5-271%from 71%+4.61/7n=7
vs CIN + outdoors5-271%from 71%+4.61/7n=7
on turf + under this head coach17-868%from 51%+4.525/25n=25
+ in the last 5 seasons17-868%from 68%+4.525/25n=25
in September + under this head coach9-564%from 52%+2.914/14n=14
+ in the last 5 seasons9-564%from 64%+2.914/14n=14
on turf + in the last 5 seasons19-1261%from 51%+2.625/31n=31
on the road + in September26-1859%from 50%+2.46/44n=44
+ under this head coach6-0100%from 59%+7.46/6n=6
+ in the last 5 seasons6-0100%from 100%+7.46/6n=6
+ in the last 5 seasons6-186%from 59%+4.86/7n=7
+ outdoors12-957%from 59%+3.70/21n=21
+ on turf1-517%from 57%-6.20/6n=6
+ on turf15-1354%from 59%+0.76/28n=28
+ under this head coach6-0100%from 54%+7.46/6n=6
+ in the last 5 seasons6-186%from 54%+4.86/7n=7
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.