MIA at LVLV -3.5o/u 40.5
ST Model MIA -1.1(-4.6 vs market)
Since first recorded LV -30.5 → LVo/u 40.5flat49d ago · 9 books · 6 moved off it
Trends · player props · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
MIA — the basics
419 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 106-104 | 50% | -0.3 | 0/210 | n=210 |
| vs LV | 10-5 | 67% | +4.1 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| as an underdog | 121-121 | 50% | +0.2 | 0/242 | n=242 |
| spread 3.5-6.5 | 67-71 | 49% | -1.3 | 0/138 | n=138 |
| in the Sunday late window | 42-29 | 59% | +1.4 | 0/71 | n=71 |
| in September | 41-46 | 47% | -1.6 | 0/87 | n=87 |
| indoors | 21-19 | 53% | +0.8 | 0/40 | n=40 |
| on grass | 148-156 | 49% | -0.1 | 0/304 | n=304 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 44-42 | 51% | -0.8 | 0/86 | n=86 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
MIA — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.0 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 419 graded games: -0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=419 |
MIA — combinations
66 lean MIA · 34 lean against
Read this first. 127 combinations shown. The best one here is 90%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 82% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in the Sunday late window + indoors | 9-1 | 90%from 59% | +5.0 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| vs LV + in September | 5-1 | 83%from 67% | +4.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + on grass | 5-1 | 83%from 83% | +4.8 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| vs LV + as an underdog | 4-1 | 80%from 67% | +8.8 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| + on grass | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +8.8 | 0/5 | n=5 |
| vs LV + on grass | 10-5 | 67%from 67% | +4.1 | 0/15 | n=15 |
| on the road + vs LV | 4-2 | 67%from 50% | +6.7 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + on grass | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +6.7 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| spread 3.5-6.5 + indoors | 7-4 | 64%from 49% | -2.1 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| + on grass | 4-2 | 67%from 64% | -1.3 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| in the Sunday late window + in the last 5 seasons | 7-4 | 64%from 59% | +0.1 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| on the road + in the Sunday late window | 31-18 | 63%from 50% | +2.3 | 0/49 | n=49 |
| + indoors | 9-1 | 90%from 63% | +5.0 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + on grass | 18-12 | 60%from 63% | +2.9 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| + in September | 6-5 | 55%from 63% | -2.0 | 0/11 | n=11 |
| + on grass | 3-3 | 50%from 55% | -3.3 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | -3.6 | 0/8 | n=8 |
| indoors + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 53% | +2.1 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| as an underdog + in the Sunday late window | 29-20 | 59%from 50% | +2.1 | 0/49 | n=49 |
| + indoors | 9-1 | 90%from 59% | +5.0 | 0/10 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 59% | -1.5 | 0/9 | n=9 |
| + on grass | 17-14 | 55%from 59% | +2.6 | 0/31 | n=31 |
| + in September | 6-6 | 50%from 59% | -2.9 | 0/12 | n=12 |
| + on grass | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | -4.6 | 0/7 | n=7 |
| as an underdog + indoors | 17-13 | 57%from 50% | +0.9 | 0/30 | n=30 |
| + on grass | 4-2 | 67%from 57% | -1.5 | 0/6 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +2.2 | 0/7 | n=7 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.